What’s your name, little girl? (I wouldn’t tell anyone who called me “little girl.”)

There’s power in names. There’s power in labels, in groupings, in language.

That’s why we fight so fiercely about the terms we use to refer to ourselves and each other.

Right now I’m struggling with my own name. I dig the Sally Strange moniker. Its scansion is the same as my real name, which is pretty unusual. I used to go by Valkyrie607. Put those two facts together, do a google search on both my online handles, and you could figure out who I am fairly easily, I reckon. And I don’t particularly mind people knowing, but I prefer to keep a digital divide, mostly for purposes of googling. My work involves outreach and communication. Political and religious opinions–upstate New York is plenty religious. Home of Mormonism’s most impossible happenings, and we got our own Catholic saint last year, a Native woman named Kateri Tekakwitha. Religion is an important thing here, like many places–more so than it was in Vermont. Vermont is very atheist-friendly–Vermont is actually the least religious state in the union. More than a third of Vermonters have no faith. It’s nice.

Anyway, I’m rambling. I was talking about my name. Like I said, I prefer to have that separation between my real name and my online persona of Sally Strange. I hear people talking about how it’s anonymity that’s ruining the caliber of discourse on the internet, but I don’t think that’s it. It is really names that make the difference? Part of the reason I’m not using my real name right now is that I wish to avoid harassment, of myself, and of my friends and family. This is such a common occurrence, and it’s obvious that writing about feminist stuff, as I am wont to do, triggers a larger risk of harassment materializing than writing about less controversial subject. Then also, there’s the fact that my current work contract is temporary, and in 11 months’ time I’ll be looking for work again. Coming off like a political agitator/opinionated blogger with a (however tiny) media platform–ehh, maybe not such a great idea when applying for professional office type jobs.

I’d like to use my real name someday. I can envision a life path in which I could do that without risk to potential employment in five years or so. If that’s something that’s sewn up, then I feel like I can handle the rest of it. I can deal with comments and spam email and whatnot. I know when to invoke law enforcement and when not to.

All of this, because I’m starting up my blog again and contemplating going to a convention. Amazing.

This is why Jerry Coyne is wrong: whether it’s cowardice or not, taking negative social repercussions of holding an unpopular view into account is rational. Pseudonymity allows us to hear voices that would get shut out of the conversation by a “real name rule.” Mine, for example, for a few years anyway. You would only get to hear from older Sally, not present day Sally. And you wouldn’t get to hear from Natalie Reed. And there are thousands more like us out there, disproportionately black and brown, and disproportionately female, disproportionately genderqueer and mentally ill and disabled. Because those are all the same factors that confound our ability to access education, to get good jobs, and so on.

And then there’s the fact that it’s just not accurate to say that using real names increases civility. Think about a bar or a club. You own the facility. People come there to drink and party and get frisky with each other. You don’t want fights and you don’t want harassment. What do you do?

a.) Make everybody get a name tag when they pay the cover charge and show their ID. Use the ID to verify their real name. Better yet, make them write their phone number on the name tags too. This will ensure that everyone is accountable and so nobody will be rude or start a fight.

b.) Employ bouncers to keep an eye on the crowd and occasionally eject those who can’t or won’t follow the rules of civility.

I don’t think that real names would be any more effective in a club than it is online. Certainly being on Facebook or Twitter under their real names has not deterred thousands of people from tweeting blatantly offensive bigoted nonsense of all stripes. The “Not Racist But” blog documents this phenomenon with regards to race.

I hope that pseudonymity continues as long as there is a need for it. Right now I need it, more’s the pity. Building a more economically secure, environmentally just world will increase the number of people able to take the risks and responsibility of revealing their real names online. Oops! Hey, wait a minute–it’s almost like everything we do has political influences and consequences. Everyone’s a partisan somehow. Claiming the alleged (not documented) benefit of increased civility is a worthwhile trade-off for decreased participation by people who are likely to already be marginalized in some way is a political statement, and it’s one that seems at odds with the rest of Jerry Coyne’s beliefs to me. I hope he and those who agree with him have really given serious thoughts to what perspectives they might be missing out on. Son of Baldwin, for example. And countless others. Rather than requiring everyone to use real names, and accusing those who don’t of cowardice, let’s work together to create a world where sharing one’s real name online inspires less fear.

Advertisements

10 Comments

Filed under Anti-bigotry, Anti-racism, Atheism, Feminism, Personal, Religion

10 responses to “What’s your name, little girl? (I wouldn’t tell anyone who called me “little girl.”)

  1. Sorry to hear that after the TF threat etc some idiot found your name, I hope that was not put on the Slymepit! I saw Jen Philips on Twitter has been getting magazines/subs posted to her by someone who got her address, same as PZ getting rubbish. They love to find any way of shutting people up who they don’t like, be that by photoshop, online harassment or even sending crap through the post it seems…

  2. I don’t know if it was on the Slymepit or not–I don’t inspect the place. It was on Twitter. I don’t have any way to squelch the information so the best I can do is avoid mentioning it overmuch. I don’t mind the rest of it, but it could possibly interfere with my work–check my updated “About” page, I’m not unemployed anymore!

  3. Hi. Found you via your comment on Rebecca’s post on Skepchick today. Love your Flynn icon. šŸ™‚

    Agreed on the need for pseudonymity. Since I’ve had alter ego names ever since I first got online (1996), I’ve never had a problem with it. Online identities can be consistent even if the name next to the icon isn’t the one on our birth certificates. I continue to bristle at the desired “requirement” for real names by people who can’t handle it. To me, it just seems like another attempt at control from the folks who don’t want us to speak at all, the folks who keep yelling for civility while they’re fighting for their guns. Ambiguity scares them.
    /rant

  4. Hi Sally! Just checking in to give you support for restarting the blog. These are really tough times for women commenting about feminist issues. I will try to keep up with your blogging. Please know that you have at least one follower who will never be rude. I hate rude! }B*)
    Jim

  5. I really don’t mind rudeness qua rudeness, Jim–you’ll find I can be pretty rude myself, when I feel like it. There’s a distinction between rudeness and sexism. You can be rude without being sexist and sexist without being rude.

  6. Just thought you’d like to know you’ve got a new follower! Good luck with the blog restart, I’m looking forward to reading your upcoming posts šŸ˜€

  7. I dig your ranting, and I totally agree. Also, I believe 1996 is when I first got my online handle, posting on http://www.heartless-bitches.com. What a great introduction to the internet that was!

  8. Oh good! I posted my comment and then wondered how rude of a first comment it really was. Instant ranting + total strangers=?. But yeah, the “real name” business is really irksome.

    1996 was a good year, eh? Although this is the first I’ve visited Heartless Bitches. Looks like a great site.

  9. I just realized that I have nested comments on my own blog! The shame!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s